Moa Birds!

Moa!

De-extinction: The Argument Against :

Should Moa be De-extinction? 

Moa Should not be De-extinction because

Bringing animals back to life could be dangerous.

The Reason for not bringing Moa back is that you

don’t know if their brains are working Properly or

You don’t know what they could turn out to be or be like. 

Why Do Scientists argue about De-extinction? 

Many people believe the De-extinction is a waste of money and effort, Although technology is almost here, bringing the moa back would be a Huge venture. It would take a large team of Scientists and would need lots And lots of money. You would also need a huge safe habitat for them to Live in and for them to have the right foods and needs too. It is very Expensive to bring back even just one moa. 

Would you ever own your own company and sell Moa?

No - Because own your own company and selling Moa birds is a very Hard company job. As I said before Moa do take a large team of Scientists And would need lots and lots of money to build a Moa even just one Moa Would cost a lot. Moa birds are huge and very long, For the species to survive, You would need lots of them both females and males so they could breed and become established.

 Do we need Moa Birds here in New Zealand?  

No - Because would it even know how to be a Moa?

If not who would Teach it? Where would it live? At the moment, releasing a genetically Modified organism into the wild is still Illegal here in New Zealand. Many Species have been Extinct because of the habitat in which they Lived was destroyed, So they were Destroyed because of there habitat Was destroyed

by Humans that hunt them down. 

Conclusion :  

Moa were very long birds, not tall birds as the early 

depictions would Have them. …The myth, starting with 

The early writer such as Haast, that Moa were grassland 

Grazing birds, prevailed until the 1980s when Research

Concluded that Moa were forest birds.